front 1
How do an observation, a hypothesis, and a prediction differ? | back 1 -
Observation - acquisition of information from a
primary source
-
Hypothesis - a testable statement to explain a
phenomenon or a set of observations
-
Prediction - a measurable or observable result that
may be correct if a hypothesis is valid
|
front 2
What makes a hypothesis useful for scientific investigations
that try to explain the natural world? | back 2 - A hypothesis is useful for investigations because you must
have an original idea to
test to see if that is correct. It also specifies the expected
relationship between variables. It helps you identify controls and
variables to test.
|
front 3
Give examples of hypotheses that are and are not
scientifically useful. State the null hypothesis that corresponds to
each of your examples. | back 3 -
Scientifically Useful Hypothesis: Squirrels only eat
nuts.
-
Scientifically Useful Null Hypothesis: Squirrels do
not only eat nuts.
-
Scientifically Unuseful Hypothesis: Dinosaurs like
cinnamon toast crunch.
-
Scientifically Unuseful Null Hypothesis: Dinosaurs do
not like cinnamon toast crunch.
|
front 4
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a scientific Theory? | back 4 A scientific theory is an explanation for a very general class of
phenomena or observation that are supported by a wide variety of evidence.
A hypothesis is only a testable statement to explain a phenomenon or
a set of observations.
Theory is also usually used to explain broad patterns while a
hypothesis is used to explain more tightly focused questions. A theory
replaces a hypothesis after testing confirms hypothesis. A theory also
serves as the framework for the development of new hypothesis. |
front 5
What are the two components of Cell Theory and of the Theory
of Evolution by Natural Selection? What are the two conditions
required by the process component of evolutionary theory? | back 5
Cell Theory:
-
Pattern: All living things are made of
cells
-
Process: All cells come from preexisting cells -
determined by Pasteur’s experiment
Natural Selection:
-
Pattern: Species are related to one another and their
characteristics change over time
-
Process: Natural selection explains how evolution
changes over time
Two conditions required by the process component of
evolutionary theory: Characteristics have to be heritable, traits
allow people to produce offspring and increased fitness |
front 6
What is the hypothesis of Spontaneous Generation and how does
Cell Theory challenge that hypothesis? In the Pasteur experiment two
types of flasks were used. For each flask, what is the outcome
predicted by Spontaneous Generation? By Cell Theory? Why did Pasteur
use a swan-necked flask? Why did he boil the broth in both flasks? | back 6 -
Spontaneous generation: cells arise spontaneously
from nonliving materials and cell theory challenges that
hypothesis by proposing that cells are produced only when
preexisting cells grow and divide
-
Straight neck flask
- Spontaneous generation prediction: Cells will appear
in broth
- Cell theory
prediction: Cells will appear in broth
-
Swan-necked flask
- Spontaneous generation prediction: Cells will appear
in broth
- Cell theory
prediction: Cells will NOT appear in broth
-
Pasteur used a swan-necked flask so it would
prevent cells from the air from reaching the broth by trapping
them in the swan neck
-
He boiled the broth in both flasks to sterilize the
broth and kill any living cells present in the flask
|
front 7
What are the similarities and differences between organisms in
the three domains of life? What do the nodes and branches of a
phylogenetic tree indicate? How can genetic information be used to
generate a phylogenetic tree? | back 7 - Bacteria, Eukarya, Archaea
- A difference between
prokaryotes and eukaryotes is that eukaryotes have a nucleus. The
majority of Bacteria and Archaea are unicellular and many eukaryotes
are multicellular.
- All contain genetic material, all
contain plasma membrane
- The nodes of a phylogenetic tree
indicate the species that the organisms are related to through
evolution, including their most recent common ancestor.
- The
nucleotides of a various species’ DNA may be compared in order to
create a phylogenetic tree. Species that are more similar are drawn
as sharing a common ancestor; ones that differ are shown to diverge
on the tree.
- Species that are part of the same evolutionary
lineage have the same changes in RNA
|
front 8
What are the key steps in hypothesis testing? What are the
essential elements of a scientific experiment? Design an experiment
to test the hypothesis that squirrels prefer nuts over chicken wings. | back 8
1. State the hypothesis as precisely as possible and
the predictions it makes
2. Design an observational or experimental study that is capable
of testing those predictions
Large sample size, include control groups, have
constant/equivalent experimental conditions, repeatability |
front 9
Describe the two hypotheses proposed to account for the
observation that giraffes have long necks. What are the predictions
of the first, “food competition” hypothesis? What evidence is cited
in your textbook that supports one or more of these predictions?
What are the observations that gave rise to the alternative, sexual
competition hypothesis? What evidence is cited that is consistent
with the second hypothesis? Do biologist agree that there is
sufficient evidence to reject or confirm either hypothesis? Could
both hypotheses be true? | back 9 -
1. Food competition - Giraffes compete for food with
other species of mammals, can reach higher when there is less food
on the ground
-
2. Sexual competition - Fighting with males over
female reproduction, able to strike harder blows if neck is
longer
-
Food competition hypothesis predicts that neck length
is variable among giraffes, neck length is heritable among
giraffes, and giraffes feed in high trees (esp. during dry season
when food is scarce)
-
Evidence supporting predictions: neck length
is variable and long necked
males are more
successful with fighting
-
Observations that gave rise to the sexual competition
hypothesis: based on observations of males fighting each other for
reproduction with females
-
Evidence cited for the second hypothesis is that
males actually do
perform better in fights if their necks are longer
-
Biologists agree that there is not enough evidence to
reject or confirm either hypothesis, however with more
research/data they could
be proven or unproven
|