front 1 One organism inhibits another by consuming a shared nutrient resource | back 1 Consumptive |
front 2 One organism occupies space, preventing another from having it | back 2 Preemptive |
front 3 One organism grows directly over another. | back 3 Overgrowth |
front 4 Chemical warfare between competitors | back 4 Chemical (allelopathy) |
front 5 Aggressive behavioral exclusion of an organism from another’s defended territory | back 5 Territorial |
front 6 non-territorial encounters reducing growth. | back 6 Encounter |
front 7 The outcome of competition is often determined by | back 7 competition for the limiting resource |
front 8 limitations on growth determined by the availability of the scarcest resource | back 8 Liebig’s law of the minimum |
front 9 resources species could utilize in the absence of other species niche absent of competition | back 9 Fundamental niche |
front 10 resources actually utilized by the species after the effects of all species niche with competition | back 10 Realized niche |
front 11 The greater the niche overlap between two competitors the Fig 14.3 | back 11 greater the competition |
front 12 The lower the abundance of the resources the Fig 14.3 | back 12 greater the competition |
front 13 The effects of competing species are not equal interaction betw 2 species (ammensalism) | back 13 Asymmetric competition |
front 14 Stems from Asymmetric competition: one species is affected negatively and the other isnt | back 14 Amensalism |
front 15 Experiment 1: with P Caudatum and P. Bursaria that were grown both together and isolated demonstrated Fig 14.9 | back 15 Competitive coexistence |
front 16 Why did competitive coexistence happen between those two? Fig 14.9 | back 16 P. caudatum consumed only bacteria while P. bursaria was able to consume both bacteria and yeast. |
front 17 Experiment 2: P. caudatum and P. aurelia were grown both in isolation and together, demonstrated Fig 14.9 | back 17 competitive exclusion |
front 18 Why did competitive exclusion happen between those two? Fig 14.9 | back 18 P. caudatum and P. auralia both consumed only bacteria, and P. auralia was the superior competitor for bacteria |
front 19 Modified version of Gause: Competitive exclusion principle Resource partitioning (niche partitioning) - Ex. Anolis Lizards | back 19 Competitors that use a limiting resource in the same cannot coexist |
front 20 Lotka and Volterra modified logistic equation | back 20 dN/dt = rN(K– N)/K r= maximum growth rate N= actual population size K= carrying capacity |
front 21 What does Lotka Volterra model tell us about competitive coexistence? | back 21 Competing species coexist when they do not compete with each other |
front 22 SLIDE 30 Equation XXXX READ SLIDES XXXX | back 22 If α > 1.0, then sp. 2 individuals carry |
front 23 Zero growth isocline tells us that | back 23 On the isocline, dN 1/dt= 0, |
front 24 G. Tansley Experiment with Galium saxatile and Galium sylvestre resulted in | back 24 Each species was at a disadvantage in competition when not grown on their preferred soil type. Takeaway: The outcome of competition between species can depend on the environment. |