front 1 the analysis of genetic diversity helps us to | back 1 understand our evolutionary history |
front 2 BRCA1 (breast cancer gene 1) and BRCA 2 (breast cancer gene 2) are genes that produce | back 2 proteins that help repair damaged DNA (genes are typically italized, while the proteins they produces are not) |
front 3 BCRA1 and BRCA2 are sometimes called | back 3 tumor suppressor genes because when they have certin changes, called harmful variants, cancer can develop |
front 4 phylogenies can be studied at the allele level | back 4 not all alleles are continuously transmitted to the next generation |
front 5 genetic loci have their | back 5 own genealogy |
front 6 change from G to T represents a | back 6 genetic synapomorphy |
front 7 gene tree | back 7 refers to the branched genealogical lineage of homologous alleles that traces their evolution back to an ancestral allele |
front 8 alleles from different populations or species are used to | back 8 construct phylogenies |
front 9 alleles can be sampled from | back 9 different populations or species, revealing their phylogenies over much greater spans of time |
front 10 gene tree for BRCA1 gene in mammals descending from a | back 10 common ancestor approximately 160 millions years ago |
front 11 coalescent theory | back 11 a model of how alleles sampled from a population may have originated from a common ancestor (no recombination, natural selection, nor gene flow or population structure, so each variant is equally like to be passed from one generation to the next) model look backwards in time, merging alleles into.a single ancestral copy according to random process in coalescence events |
front 12 in coalescent theory model, the expected time between successice coalescnce increases almost | back 12 exponentially back in time (with wide variance) and variance comes from random allele passing from one generation to the next and random mutations in the alleles |
front 13 coalescence time varies for | back 13 different genes |
front 14 tracking phylogenies back in time leads to | back 14 nodes in gene trees that represent coalescence, or common ancestry |
front 15 hypothetical gene tree for BRCA1 shows | back 15 the historical relationships among 20 alleles samples from a single population |
front 16 because diploid individuals have two copies for each gene, ___ | back 16 studies typically focus on sampled alleles which figures depicts a sample coalescent allele in a constant population |
front 17 ortholog | back 17 is one or more homologous genes separated by a speciation event (e.g. BRCA1 in humans is an ortholog of PIGBRCA1 in swine) |
front 18 introgression | back 18 describes the movement of alleles from one species (due to hybridization) or population to another |
front 19 sampling the same gene in one individual of each species, we can ____ | back 19 trace back their genealogies until they coalescence in an ancestral allele |
front 20 incomplete lineage sorting | back 20 occurs when a genetic polymorphism (2+ variant forms of a DNA sequence) persist through multiple speciation events |
front 21 when fixation of alternative alleles eventually occurs in the descendent species, ___ | back 21 the pattern of retention of alleles may yield a gene tree that differs from the true phylogeny |
front 22 correct trees are genrated by | back 22 evaluating entire genomes |
front 23 kronenberg | back 23 lined up segments and estimated the divergence of the human segment with that of other species |
front 24 each nuclotide is a | back 24 potentially informative character |
front 25 homoplasy is common (only 4 possible character states) so ___ | back 25 the probability that separate lineages independently arrive at the same character state can be high |
front 26 genes differ in | back 26 rate of evolution |
front 27 slowly evolving genes are useful for | back 27 distantly related species (purifying selection) |
front 28 rapidly evolving genes are useful for | back 28 closely related lineages |
front 29 homoplasy can present a | back 29 misleading picture of the parsimonious tree |
front 30 exon regions | back 30 evolve very slowly when they are under strong purifying selection |
front 31 purifying selection | back 31 removes deleterious from a population |
front 32 introns (non coding region within genes) and intergene regions (region between genes) are | back 32 often effectively neutral with respect to selection |
front 33 introns and intergene regions have | back 33 more variable sequences, providing more info to use in building a tree. However, they have more homoplasy due to random convergence of base pairs. |
front 34 maximum parsimony | back 34 simplest explanation favored |
front 35 bootstrapping | back 35 repeated resampling of a subset of the data assigns measures of accuracy to sample estimates |
front 36 distance matrix (neighbor joining) | back 36 clusters taxa base on genetic distance |
front 37 maximum likelihood | back 37 finds most likely tree given specific model of molecular evolution |
front 38 bayesian methods | back 38 looks at probability that a tree is correct given a specific model of moleculat evolution |
front 39 distance-matrix method | back 39 procedure for constructing phylogen etic trees by clustering taxa based on the proximity between protein or DNA sequences |
front 40 neighbor joining | back 40 distance-matix method that identifies the tree topology with the shortest possible branch lengths |
front 41 multiregional model (of human origins) | back 41 homo sapiens evolved gradually across the entire old world over the last 1 millions years from an older species of hominin |
front 42 out of africa model (of human origins) | back 42 homo sapiens evolved in africa alone; other hominin fossils from the past million years represent extinct brances |
front 43 examines using microsatellites, | back 43 a noncoding stretch of DNA containing a string of short repeated segments |
front 44 phylogenetic data supports | back 44 out of africa model (because humans have been in africa much longer than other parts of the world, africans today are muc more genetically diverse than other humans) |
front 45 the evolutionary tree of HIV-1 (using maximum-likelihood) shows | back 45 the virus jumped hosts multiple times |
front 46 the evolution of living organisms is the consequence of two processes | back 46 -evolution depends on the gentic variability generated by mutation, which continuously arise within population -it also relies on changes in the frequency of alleles within populations over time |
front 47 fate of those mutations that affect the fitness of their carrier is partly determined by | back 47 natural selection |
front 48 mutations may have | back 48 different effect on fitness |
front 49 synonymous (silent) mutation | back 49 does not alter the amino acid sequence of the protein (changing one of the nucleotides btut not altering sequence) |
front 50 nonsynonymous mutation | back 50 alters the amino acid sequence of the protein (can affect phenotype and thus are more likely to be subject to selection) |
front 51 positive or directional selection | back 51 higher fitness tend to increase in frequency over time until they reach fixation, thus replacing the ancestral allele in the population |
front 52 negative or purifying selection | back 52 new mutations that decrease the carriers fitness tend to disappear from populations through a process |
front 53 mutation is advantageous only in | back 53 heterozygotes but not in homozygotes |
front 54 balancing selection | back 54 alleles tend to be maintained at an intermediate frequency in populations by way of the process |
front 55 genetic drift | back 55 allelic frequencies may change simply as a consequence of this random process of gamete sampling |
front 56 diff between genetic drift and natural selection is that | back 56 changes in allele frequency cause by genetic drift are random rather than directional (genetic drift leads to the fixation of some allele and the loss of others) |
front 57 neutral theory of molecular evolution | back 57 motoo mimura states that most evolution at the molecular level is neutral (due to drift). neutral mutations become fixed in lineages at a regular, clocklike rate (molecular clocks) |
front 58 neutral evolution | back 58 -underlying basis of selection tests -provide info about molecular processes that are involved in genome functioning -can ultimately contribute to phenotypic evolution and to species adaptation |
front 59 distantly related paris of species have a | back 59 large number of diff substitutions in the cytochrome c gene |
front 60 diff types of DNA segments evolve at | back 60 different rates |
front 61 pseudogenes | back 61 have a far faster rate of nucleotide substitution than do nonsynonymous (replacement) sites in protein coding genes |
front 62 sorobey | back 62 used early samples of HIV1 from the DCR to calibrate estimates of the rate of molecular evolution of HIV1 (growth of major settlements in central africa coincides with the emergence of HIV1) |
front 63 alleles can spread quickly through population when subjected to | back 63 strong natural selection |
front 64 selective sweep | back 64 adaptive alleles spreads through a population more quickly than recombination acts to separate it from neighboring alleles |
front 65 genetic hitchhicking | back 65 strongly selected alleles are frequently found in a population surrounded by the same set of alleles at neighboring locations |
front 66 strong natural selection leaves | back 66 a signature in neighboring alleles |
front 67 loci adjacent to the selected allele will be | back 67 less variable than expected |
front 68 lactose intolerance is an example of | back 68 genetic hitchhiking |
front 69 F(ST) | back 69 method detects loci with allele frequencies that are more different than expected between populations. these outlier loci are likely to be near to regions of the genome experiencing strong selection |
front 70 synonymous substitution | back 70 do not change protein (should evolce at a neutral rate) |
front 71 nonsynonymous substitution | back 71 change protein |
front 72 faster evolution than synonymous sites | back 72 indicates positive selection |
front 73 slower evolution than synonymous sites | back 73 indicates purifying selection |
front 74 the number of synonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site in the pseudogene is | back 74 dN |
front 75 the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site is | back 75 dS |
front 76 one sign of positive selection is | back 76 the accumulation of an unusually high level of substitutions that can change the structure of proteins |
front 77 under neutral evolution, we expect that | back 77 dN = dS |
front 78 positive selection produces a gene in which there are more nonsynonymous mutations than would be expected, so | back 78 dN > dS |
front 79 genetic drift results in alleles with synonymous mutations becoming more frequent, so | back 79 dS > dN |
front 80 Genome size | back 80 varies tremendously |
front 81 Bacterial genome size is | back 81 dependant mainly on number of genes |
front 82 eukaryotic genomes vary more in | back 82 size due to noncoding DNA |
front 83 bacterial symbionts often exeprience a | back 83 reduction in genome size |
front 84 different alleles for genes coexists in populations, each with a | back 84 lineage that traces their history back through time |
front 85 gene trees are used to reconstruct the historical relationships among | back 85 alleles in populations and species |
front 86 it is possible to trace gene tree genealogies back in time to | back 86 discover when mutations produced new alleles |
front 87 invomplete lineage sorting and introgression both result in gene trees that | back 87 differ from true phylogenies |
front 88 scientists can test predictions of phylogenetic hypotheses developed with | back 88 one line of evidence by using other independent lines of evidence to draw conclusions |
front 89 neutral mutations accumulate with | back 89 clocklike regularity in genomes |
front 90 molecular clocks can be used to | back 90 estimate the origin of diseases and major clades |
front 91 the neutral theory of molecular evolution describes | back 91 patterns of nucleotide substitution predicted under drift alone |
front 92 neutral theory predicts the | back 92 neutral mutations will yield nucleotide substitutions at a rate equivalent to the rate of mutations |
front 93 neutral variation should | back 93 accucmulate in a clocklike fashion |
front 94 both positive and purifying selections leave | back 94 distinctive genetic signatures that can be detected |
front 95 bacteria usually have small genomes made up if mostly genes, but eukaryotes have | back 95 genomes that vary greatly in size |
front 96 as more genomes are sequenced, | back 96 our understanding of genome evolution is changing |