proximate causes
behavior focus on genetic and physiological mechanisms (whatever triggered)
ultimate casues
of behavior focus on its effect on reproductive success (why it did) (effects post-sting)
behavior is the
observable response of organisms to external or internal stimuli
altriusm is a
behavior that benefits others at personal cost
Goal to pass on genes, for betterment of group, some individuals do not reproduce
reciprocal altruism is the
evolution of altruism among non kin
most altruistic acts serve to
benfit the individual's close relatives, or kin
group selection
to explain the existence of altruism
Natural selection produces beneficial outcomes for whole group/species
If group selfish, they would die out quickly due to overexploitation, but altruist fitness would increase
individual selection
Group under attack via George Williams
Evolution works with individual selection not group, traits chosen for benefit of individual not group
three arguments against group selection to prevent group selection
-mutation
-immigration
-lack of an ability to predict future source availability
mutation
limited resources, mutated individuals use said mutation to advantage/offspring advantage (two eggs to three eggs given sufficient resources)
immigration
more eggs produced, could move away
Lack of an ability to predict future source availability
group selection assumes that individuals can predict food availability within population
Infanticide
Pop. size controlled via competition (individuals want control as much resource as possible), results in infanticide (male bears killing cubs/lions killing cubs to take over pride)
Coefficient of Relatedness
Important to evolution of altruism, vested interest in protect related individuals (siblings, offspring)
Hamilton’s Rule (THIS WILL BE ON FINAL)
rB>C
altruistic gene will be favored by natural selection
benefits received and given is greater than cost
Inclusive Fitness (important)
total # of gene copies passed on to relatives + reproductive output
Kin Fitness
behavior that lowers fitness of individual, but enhances fitness of relative
Eusociality
organisms that have reproductive division of labor, overlapping generations, and cooperative care of young
[ex.] Bees have female workers, male drones, only queen reproduces, males die shortly after
[ex.] Naked mole rats also exhibit similar behavior to bees (however both parents are diploid)
Males -> haploid, females -> diploid (haplodiploidy), females more related to
sisters than own offspring
coefficient of relatedness (r) of sisters is
0.50 (from father) + 0.25 (from mother) = 0.75
More advantageous for females to stay and care for sisters
Eusociality due to
lifestyle NOT genetics
Certain conditions for eusociality
- Individuals are confined to burrows or nests and escape is difficult.
- A dominant individual (i.e., queen) can prevent other individuals from reproducing.
- Food is abundant enough to support high concentrations of individuals.
- These conditions are also met in colonies of naked mole rats, which are diploid mammals.
- Females do not reproduce and only the queen (shown resting on workers) has offspring
Reciprocal Altruism
cost for altruism offset by likelihood of return benefit
[ex.] Female vampire bat will regurgitate some food to feed other females, high likelihood that behavior will be returned later
Prisoner’s Dilemma (can’t get the chart on here, but just look at the slide)
Games in nature, tit-for-tat strategy usually most stable (do what was done unto them)
players do unto others exactly as has been done unto them
Evolutionary Stable Strategy (ESS)
if adopted by population, cannot be invaded by alternative (rare) strategy
Group Living
Benefits usually outweigh costs
Benefits: Group defense (increased vigilance (many eyes hypothesis) and protection through numbers)
Scan Frequency vs. Scan Duration
Frequency decrease as group size increases
Not as supported: duration decreases as size increases
Group Living and Food
- Take down predators of bigger size
- Can exploit discoveries of other individuals in group
- Orca Example: More than enough food for 3, stable enough with 5, not enough food for 6
Selfish Herd
- William Hamilton (1971)
- Individuals in group will choose position in center for greatest protection (like sardines), bunch together when under attack
Foraging Behavior
To remain at food or seek out new source? - Analysis via optimality modeling (Animal should behave in way that maximizes behavior minus costs)
Optimizing foraging behavior
difference between energetic benefits of food consumption and the energetic costs of food gathering is maximized
Optimal Foraging Theory
- maximize benefits and minimize costs of food gathering -
- More net energy, greater reproductive success
[ex.] Northwestern crow example: only large whelks (fewest drops required to break open)
[ex.] Leafcutter ant example: larger ants only forage at night due to parasitic flies active during day, small ants forage during the day
NAO (North Atlantic Oscillation) and Effects
Basically causes more snow in north
Heavier snowfall -> bigger wolf packs -> decrease in moose pop. -> more trees due to reduced moose pop.
Territory
fixed area where individual excludes other members of own species via marking or aggression
Provides exclusive access to resource
Larger territory = more resource, but more to defend (Usually big groups only defend mating/nesting areas instead of entire territory)
Game Theory= refer to document in modules (WILL BE ON FINAL)
Conclusions made:
- Fighting strategy is frequency dependent.
- The ESS is often a mixture of different strategy types like Hawk, Dove, and Bourgeois.
- The ESS is dependent on the values of rewards.
- The frequency of Hawk behavior increases as the payoff increases. (frequency of duck increases as risk of injury increases)
Fisher’s principle
1:1 sex ration is ESS as fitness of one gender reduced when overproduction of that gender
Polygyny
one male with many females (elk, elephant seals)
Polyandry
one female with many males, usually bigger than males (black widows)
Promiscuous
both males and females mate with multiple females and males, respectively (bonobos, mollusks)
The more similar in appearance males and females are, the more of a
chance they are monogamous animals (golden eagles, swans, one species of mouse, etc.)
Monogamy
two hypotheses for monogamy
Mate-guarding hypothesis
males stay with females to prevent other males from being fertilized by other males (some types of beetles and dunnocks)
Male assistance hypothesis
males remain to help rear offspring (70% of bird species are monogamous)
Female enforced monogamy
females stop male partners from being polygamous (burying beetles)
Purple Martin EPC
- Older martins claim top levels of martin house
- Sing song to attract others
- Older martins then mate with females of less experienced males
Species in stable environments with uniform food distribution
territorial and monogamous are
Species in areas that occasional have overabundance of food (Also, birds that produce nidifugous young (eyes open with feathers on body) more likely to be polygynous)
polygynous [males bigger than females)
Resource-based polygyny
good nest sites in male territory (male lark buntings hold territories in shade -> females need shade for chicks to live)
Harem mating structures
common when females congregate in groups/herds (elephant seal harems)
Communal courting
leks, prairie chickens and mannikins
Polyandry
Honeybees, sandpipers (females defend territories, limited only by number of males to incubate eggs), hyenas (females usually bigger than males)
Intersexual selection
females choose males based on particular trait
Intrasexual selection
males fight each other over mates